All Activity

Good evening Mr Zhang, The Law Council will meet this week to discuss your application. You have a felony offence on your record, and we will need to discuss whether this excludes you from holding a practising certificate. We thank you for your patience.

Good Evening, Case has been withdrawn. Regards,

Good Afternoon. As per a conversation that occurred earlier today, my client no longer wishes to pursue this case in court and formally wishes to withdraw the booking. I apologise on behalf of myself and my client for any inconveniences this may have caused. Kind Regards, Blake Weathers

Good Afternoon all, The DOJ has approved the hearing of this appeal. Appeal date has been laid down for Wednesday the 19th of January 2022 at 20:00 AEST The Judges/Justices presiding will be as follows; Justice Morgan Freeman If the event the Judge cannot make the appeal Justice Evan will sit in absence. Matter of Heda LANGLEY VS NSWPF A full witness list that either party wishes to call on the day of appeal must be provided to Justice Freeman by Wednesday the 19th of January 2022 at 15:00 AEST Any evidence provided beyond the above date will NOT be heard on t

Good Afternoon all, The DOJ has approved the hearing of this appeal. Appeal date has been laid down for Wednesday the 19th of January 2022 at 19:00 AEST The Judges/Justices presiding will be as follows; Justice Morgan Freeman If the event the Judge cannot make the appeal Justice Evan will sit in absence. Matter of Pitt LANGLEY VS NSWPF A full witness list that either party wishes to call on the day of appeal must be provided to Justice Freeman by Wednesday the 19th of January 2022 at 15:00 AEST Any evidence provided beyond the above date will NOT be heard on t

Good Afternoon all, The DOJ has approved the hearing of this appeal. Appeal date has been laid down for Friday the 28th of January 2022 at 19:00 AEST The Judges/Justices presiding will be as follows; Justice Morgan Freeman If the event the Judge cannot make the appeal Justice Evan will sit in absence. Matter of Pitt LANGLEY VS NSWPF Charge: - Evasion of Police (x1) - Possession of an illegal firearm (x1) - Accessory to Armed Robbery Bank (x1) Full evidential disclosure is to be submitted to all parties by Tuesday the 25th of January 2022 at 23:59 A fu

Good Afternoon all, The DOJ has approved the hearing of this appeal. Appeal date has been laid down for Thursday the 27th of January 2022 at 19:00 AEST The Judges/Justices presiding will be as follows; Justice Morgan Freeman If the event the Judge cannot make the appeal Justice Evan will sit in absence. Matter of Alessandra Moonbroke VS NSWPF Charge: - Armed Robbery of a Store (x1) - Reckless Evasion (x1) - Kidnapping (x1) - Accessory to Attempted Murder (x1) Full evidential disclosure is to be submitted to all parties by Tuesday the 25th of January 2022

Pulsar's Lawyer Application Application ID #10308 Submitted on 01/17/22 at 11:40:04 AM ---------------------- OOC Contact Info Pulse | Pulse#0004 ---------------------- Character Name Jimmy Zhang ---------------------- Link to your OzzyGaming player profile https://fivem.ozzy.life/player/110000115a4e505 ---------------------- How many hours have you played on OzzyGaming's FiveM server? 1073 ---------------------- What do you think the role of a Lawyer is? I know the role of a lawyer is to not only practice the law but to ensure that innocent people arnt ge

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been ACCEPTED LS Legal will be in touch for training.

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been progressed to... PENDING Please speak to a Law Council member about organising an interview. You can easily seek out a Judge by joining Teamspeak (ts.ozzy.life) and joining the Lobby of Department of Justice.

Penguin's Lawyer Application Application ID #10302 Submitted on 01/16/22 at 01:58:35 AM ---------------------- OOC Contact Info Penguin#3853 ---------------------- Character Name Fred Watson ---------------------- Link to your OzzyGaming player profile https://fivem.ozzy.life/player/1100001142f220b ---------------------- How many hours have you played on OzzyGaming's FiveM server? 1028 ---------------------- What do you think the role of a Lawyer is? To assist clients in making a safe and legal decision. Consult with legal matters and to defend a client le

Thank you Counsellor, I have a corporate contract with Mr Langley, and he has opted to stay with DoJ. Please see below, for confirmation. The contract is commercially sensitive, and therefore I will not provide the details, however Mr Langley has indicated that he wishes to stay with DoJ and honour his contract.

Response to Libby Moretti-Capone's statement At this stage I have not yet received any notice from Mr. Pitt Langley in regards to a change of Counsel for this case. Until this has been clarified with the client and official notice has been provided by them, I would like for court proceedings to proceed as is. Regards, Blake Weathers

I am the lawyer on record for Pitt Langley and SA Lotto Co, Mr Weathers has moved to private practice and Mr Langley has indicated that he wishes to retain me as Counsel. @pinejack @PandaKazii - We await Court hearing details at your convenience.

pinejack's Court Booking Application ID #10285 Submitted on 01/11/22 at 02:53:25 PM ---------------------- Plaintiff Steam Name pittcrewgaming ---------------------- Plaintiff Name Pitt Langley ---------------------- Defendant Name New South Wales Police Department ---------------------- Claim ---------------------- Do you confirm all information provided is the truth to the best of your knowledge? Yes

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am sorry to inform you that your application has been WITHDRAWN at your request. You are able to apply again at a future date.

Its, always about who you know, and who knows & trusts you.......

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been ACCEPTED Please make yourself available for training at the agreed time. Welcome to DoJ.

This case is a waste of the courts time, on the phone call I informed the plaintiff of a better way to deal with this situation which is through PTD hence why I informed her that I put in a motion to dismiss the case. The other claim about the contract is a separate matter all together and has nothing to do with this case as it was not made by me. The New South Wales police force Personal Training Division is the appropriate body to handle such a matter, however the plaintiff has made no attempt to even try and resolve this out of court. There is no need for this case to be handle

In response to the New South Wales Police Departments response. The only timeframe currently set out by the courts is for the Court Bail & Bench Trials which states: This booking is pertaining to section Disputing Fines & Charges which states: At this stage, the prior relationship between Officer Riley and my client does not have any impact towards the booking of this case, and any bias for or against her would need to be determined by a Judge in the Courts. As well as this, his statement is only being used as evidence in support of the dispute of the Reckles

Firstly 22 days is 15 days over the time frame set out by the courts. Secondly the previous relationship does matter as the charges being contested are based on the discussion that was had with officer Riley, as per the original booking stated "In the words of Officer Riley, my client Did not evade recklessly and it should have just been evasion.". This more than warrants the dismissal of this case

In response to the motion to dismiss lodged by the New South Wales Police Force. The plaintiff has lodged the dispute to the charges laid upon them for the events transpired on the 17th of December 2021 at approximately 11:30pm, and the court booking was lodged on the 8th of January 2022. At this current time, the courts does not publicly have any statute of limitation published for the time requirement for lodging the dispute of a charge or fine, nor is it currently contained within the Law Book. Even if the 21 day rules was officially in place or otherwise cited, this claim was lodged o

To whom it may concern, The New South Wales police force request that the case be dismissed based on the following. The plaintiff has had ample time to follow the matter up however has decided to wait 22 days since it occurred which does not fall within the time frame set out by the courts. Secondly the officer that provided the information about the charge is not the arresting officer and has a previous relationship with Miss Moonbrooke making it a conflict of interest. If Miss Moonbrooke truly believes the wrong charges have been added to her record she should file a PTD

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been ACCEPTED

Thank you for taking the time to submit an application. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been ACCEPTED