Jump to content
OzzyGaming

pinejack

Members
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by pinejack

  1. Don’t apply though here anymore. Speak to a judge in city 🙂
  2. Good Afternoon. As per a conversation that occurred earlier today, my client no longer wishes to pursue this case in court and formally wishes to withdraw the booking. I apologise on behalf of myself and my client for any inconveniences this may have caused. Kind Regards, Blake Weathers
  3. Response to Libby Moretti-Capone's statement At this stage I have not yet received any notice from Mr. Pitt Langley in regards to a change of Counsel for this case. Until this has been clarified with the client and official notice has been provided by them, I would like for court proceedings to proceed as is. Regards, Blake Weathers
  4. pinejack's Court Booking Application ID #10285 Submitted on 01/11/22 at 02:53:25 PM ---------------------- Plaintiff Steam Name pittcrewgaming ---------------------- Plaintiff Name Pitt Langley ---------------------- Defendant Name New South Wales Police Department ---------------------- Claim ---------------------- Do you confirm all information provided is the truth to the best of your knowledge? Yes
  5. In response to the New South Wales Police Departments response. The only timeframe currently set out by the courts is for the Court Bail & Bench Trials which states: This booking is pertaining to section Disputing Fines & Charges which states: At this stage, the prior relationship between Officer Riley and my client does not have any impact towards the booking of this case, and any bias for or against her would need to be determined by a Judge in the Courts. As well as this, his statement is only being used as evidence in support of the dispute of the Reckless Evasion charge, not the other/s being disputed. On top of this, it has come to my attention that on the 9th of January 2022 at approximately 5:20pm AEDT, Superintendent Jake Pawar contacted my client directly via mobile phone to discuss the case with her, instead of getting myself involved. He stated to her over the phone that he "had already put through to get the claim dismissed" and to remember that the contract between Los Santos Customs and the New South Wales Police Department was on his desk. Due to these actions, my client has requested that any and all correspondence between the New South Wales Police Department and themselves relating to the Court booking and the dispute of these charges be through myself, or that I be present when conversations relating to the case take place. Regards, Blake Weathers Lawyer, Department of Justice
  6. In response to the motion to dismiss lodged by the New South Wales Police Force. The plaintiff has lodged the dispute to the charges laid upon them for the events transpired on the 17th of December 2021 at approximately 11:30pm, and the court booking was lodged on the 8th of January 2022. At this current time, the courts does not publicly have any statute of limitation published for the time requirement for lodging the dispute of a charge or fine, nor is it currently contained within the Law Book. Even if the 21 day rules was officially in place or otherwise cited, this claim was lodged on the 22nd day after the charges, however due to my client being charged at 11:25pm on the night of, an exemption could be made to extend this by one day. The New South Wales Police Department do not have any grounds to request the dismissal of this case, as their only dispute to it going forward is that it was lodged out of date, which it has not, and that the officer questioned about the arrest has had a previous relationship with my client. Neither of these reasons warrant the dismissal of this case, and we are requesting a court booking be set at the courts earliest convince as my client has been falsely accused and convicted of crimes she did not commit. Regards, Blake Weathers Lawyer, Department of Justice
  7. pinejack's Court Booking Application ID #10277 Submitted on 01/08/22 at 11:24:49 AM ---------------------- Plaintiff Steam Name Namula ---------------------- Plaintiff Name Alessandra Moonbroke ---------------------- Defendant Name New South Wales Police Department ---------------------- Claim On the 17th of December 2021 at approximately 2325 AEDT, my client Alessandra Moonbroke was arrested and charged by Officer David Yellow for the following: - Armed Robbery of a Store (x1) - Reckless Evasion (x1) - Kidnapping (x1) - Accessory to Attempted Murder (x1) On behalf of my client, we would like to dispute the following charges: - Accessory to Attempted Murder (x1) - Reckless Evasion (x1) In regards to the Accessory to Attempted Murder, my client did not actively engage in any form of violence towards the New South Wales Police Department, nor were they aware that the individual who was also caught on the scene would engage in hostilities towards the Police. As defined in the OzzyGaming Lawbook, Accessory crimes are when you have "aided or assisted in some manner with knowledge of actions being taken." and therefore should not have been charged for this as they had no prior knowledge that the other individual would act in such a way. On the 8th of Janurary 2022 at approximately 2057 AEDT, a discussion occurred with officer Simon Riley outside of the Mission Row Police Precinct, and it was discussed that my client should have actually been charged with "Evasion", not "Reckless Evasion" as my client did evade in a safe and controlled manner. In the words of Officer Riley, my client "Did not evade recklessly and it should have just been evasion.". On behalf of my client, we are looking for an amendment to their criminal record to accurately show their charges in relation to the situation, as well as for financial compensation for fines, time served and damages. ---------------------- Do you confirm all information provided is the truth to the best of your knowledge? Yes
  8. pinejack's Court Booking Application ID #9541 Submitted on 06/23/21 at 01:03:12 PM ---------------------- Plaintiff Steam Name TrapBunny ---------------------- Plaintiff Name Mona Allen ---------------------- Defendant Name New South Wales Police Department ---------------------- Claim My client, Mona Allen has been charged for the possession of an illegal firearm after a local shootout at the petrol station located at 366 in Little Seoul. She was at the gas station getting fuel when a local started shooting at her, and ended up incapacitating her. Unknown to my client, there was a kidnapping of an officer at the same gas station in the minutes before her arrival. She was then taken away by an officer in tacitcal gear and searched after she had committed no crimes or was wanted for crimes. She was then taken back to Mission Row Police Department where she requestd a lawyer. We are wishing to dispute the charges laid on her, and wish to have this matter resolved as soon as possible ---------------------- Do you confirm all information provided is the truth to the best of your knowledge? Yes
  9. Please find attached the following response: @Kraze @PandaKazii https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-a7zVgvmZav34lftolG_LVAld2W2sbGAtUUwJPOxg78/edit?usp=sharing
  10. Thank you for your response on the current legal proceedings Daniel, I will be issuing out a letter to you in response to your previous correspondence within the next 48 hours. I have been unable to before hand as I have been in the process of getting my affairs in order, and organising the funeral proceedings for my wife. I appreciate your patience during this time. - Aurelius Embershard
  11. Thank you for the response. At this moment in time, I should be available anytime after 2:00pm on Sunday however I would prefer later on in the evening. I will also provide some further clarification in regards to the court booking later tonight when I return to my office. Regards, A. Embershard - Get Outlook for iOS
  12. pinejack's Court Booking Application ID #9271 Submitted on 05/24/21 at 09:47:48 AM ---------------------- Plaintiff Steam Name Misc ---------------------- Plaintiff Name Bill Gambino, Brea Gambino, Dallas Gambino, Georgio Smith, James Kingsington, Gambino Family (ORG) ---------------------- Defendant Name New South Wales Police Department ---------------------- Claim The New South Wales Police Department's Criminal Investigation Divison has conducted a number of illegal raids on my clients, resulting in the improper search and seizure of many of my clients assets and belongings. They have also used incorrectly obtained evidence to apply for a warrant to search some of my clients. As well as this, they have used the resulting evidence from the illegal raids to apply an organisation penalty of $1,000,000.00 that we wish to dispute. Each of my clients wish to sue the Police Department for a monetary value of $500,000 for the illegal search and seizure of goods as well as placing mandatory probation periods on them as a result of said illegal search and seizure. The Gambino Family wish to also sue the Police Department for a monetary value of $2,000,000 to cover the cost of the organisation penalty, legal fees, loss of assets and income. ---------------------- Do you confirm all information provided is the truth to the best of your knowledge? Yes
  13. I think it's a good thing to keep around because it allows people who are unsure of something to ask ingame instead of having to go to either discord or TS. An example would be a newer player asking what key to do something that might not be obvious.
×
×
  • Create New...